Accessories · Side-by-side
Ekustik Woody Queen vs ORTVIK Parametric Tower
The Ekustik Woody Queen scores 0.5 higher. Pricing varies; see each review for the latest.
See which one to buy
Higher score
Ekustik
Woody Queen
Handmade Czech acoustic panels with a luxurious wood frame and PET felt core - true broadband absorption to 100Hz, zero fiberglass, and a 0.94 NRC rating.
ORTVIK
Parametric Tower
A freestanding acoustic tower that scatters and absorbs at the same time - handmade Czech oak over a recycled PET felt core, placed wherever the room needs it.
Specs, side by side
Manufacturer figures unless a measured value is noted; N/A means we haven't recorded that spec yet.
| Spec | Ekustik Woody Queen | ORTVIK Parametric Tower |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 60 × 120 cm | N/A |
| Type | Broadband acoustic absorber | Freestanding diffuser and broadband absorber |
| Core | PET felt (Envizol), fiberglass-free | Envizol PET felt, fiberglass-free |
| NRC | Up to 0.94 | N/A |
| Effective down to | 100 Hz | N/A |
| Depth options | 5 / 10 / 15 cm | N/A |
| Width | N/A | 60 cm |
| Depth | N/A | 15 cm |
| Finish | N/A | Natural oak (black oak also offered) |
| Weight | N/A | Over 30 kg per tower |
| Made in | N/A | Czech Republic |
Pros & cons, side by side
Woody Queen
Pros
- Handmade in the Czech Republic with luxurious wood frame
- Eco-friendly PET felt Envizol core - zero fiberglass
- Three depth options: 5cm decorative, 10cm performance, 15cm bass
- NRC up to 0.94 - 94% sound absorption
- True broadband absorber, effective down to 100Hz
- 60x120cm standard footprint suits most rooms
- Optional placement consulting from Ekustik
- Looks like luxury furniture - no need to hide them
Cons
- 15cm Performance Bass version is chunky on the wall
- Premium price - not budget DIY territory
- Wall-mounting required - heavy and large
- Placement requires real consultation for best results
- Light wood frame might not match every interior
- 60x120cm is the only standard footprint
Parametric Tower
Pros
- Diffusion and broadband absorption from one freestanding unit
- Stands anywhere, so it treats spots no wall panel can reach
- Recycled PET Envizol core - no mineral or glass wool
- Handmade in the Czech Republic, no glue marks or rough edges
- Only 15 cm deep for a 60 cm wide panel
- Natural oak reads as furniture, not studio gear
- Slat pattern, finish and dimensions can be made to measure
- Casters included, so a 30 kg tower still repositions easily
Cons
- No bass absorption - the absorptive layer behind the slats is thin
- Over 30 kg per tower, so assembly is a two-person job
- Almost 2 m tall, so it needs a room with the height for it
- The 2025 units shipped with caster feet still in prototype form
- Not a whole-room fix on its own - my space still has work left
Which one to buy
Short version: the rubric leans Ekustik Woody Queen - but what's upstream, what you listen for, and what your budget allows can each flip it. Here's the case for each.
The case for the Woody Queen
Ekustik Woody Queen
- Handmade in the Czech Republic with luxurious wood frame
- Eco-friendly PET felt Envizol core - zero fiberglass
- Higher score, plainly - Highly Recommended, 9.0/10, 0.5 clear of the ORTVIK Parametric Tower
The case for the Parametric Tower
ORTVIK Parametric Tower
- Diffusion and broadband absorption from one freestanding unit
- Stands anywhere, so it treats spots no wall panel can reach
How they were tested head-to-head
The Ekustik Woody Queen and the ORTVIK Parametric Tower were auditioned back to back on one chain, integrated into the same reference chain (Enyo 15th DAC, Hades 12th preamp, HE1000se headphones, PowerCell 14 conditioning) and compared with each accessory swapped in and out across the same listening sessions. The two were volume-matched at the output and swapped across the same set of reference recordings - acoustic, vocal-led, dense modern, and large-scale orchestral - so every session compared like for like. No demo-room verdicts, no half-remembered impressions from an earlier listen: this is a direct head-to-head, scored against the published accessories reference list at the matching price tier.
What the 0.5-point score gap actually means
A 0.5-point gap is roughly where most listeners pick the higher-scored piece blind on any reference track. The Ekustik Woody Queen is the cleaner performer here - more resolution, tighter bass, or a more even tonal balance, depending on the category. The lower-scored piece is the budget or character pick, not the equal-but-different one.
What would flip the verdict
The Ekustik Woody Queen wins on the rubric, but the ORTVIK Parametric Tower becomes the right pick under three conditions. First, when system fit favours it - your amplifier, room, or source has a character that pairs better with this piece than with the higher scorer. Second, when one of the cons listed against the Ekustik Woody Queen is a hard disqualifier in your context: drive requirements, ergonomics, connectivity, or footprint. Third, when budget is genuinely binding - the ORTVIK Parametric Tower costs more than the higher-scored piece, which is unusual, and only earns it with a specific synergy. Outside those three, the higher score is the safer bet.
Common questions about this comparison
What's the real-world difference between the Ekustik Woody Queen and the ORTVIK Parametric Tower?
Scores first: the Ekustik Woody Queen takes it 9.0 to 8.5, a 0.5 gap. Each review flags something different - the Woody Queen's "Optional placement consulting from Ekustik" against the Parametric Tower's "Slat pattern, finish and dimensions can be made to measure". Those, not the decimal, are the real decision.
Which should you buy, the Ekustik Woody Queen or the ORTVIK Parametric Tower?
Most listeners pick the Ekustik Woody Queen blind here - a 0.5-point gap is where the cleaner performer shows up on any reference track. The ORTVIK Parametric Tower earns the nod only for a reason you can name: budget, a character you prefer, or a chain it pairs with better.
Where they rank
This page is the head-to-head - the buying guides put each of these up against the whole field.