Headphones · Side-by-side
Sivga Anser vs Sivga Luan
The Sivga Luan scores 0.1 higher and costs $100 more - the Sivga Anser is the budget pick, the Sivga Luan the step up.
See which one to buy
Sivga
Anser
A $200 open-back dynamic with real wood cups and a tuning that delivers springy, bouncy mid-bass you won't find on $2,000 headphones - musical, fun, and built to last.
Higher score
Sivga
Luan
A $360 semi-open dynamic with real wood cups, a suspension headband, and a natural, chocolatey midrange that punches well above its price.
Which one to buy
Short version: the rubric leans Sivga Luan - but what's upstream, what you listen for, and what your budget allows can each flip it. Here's the case for each.
The case for the Anser
Sivga Anser
- Solid wood earcups with aluminum grilles and yokes
- No plastic - just wood, metal, and leather
- Cheaper by $100, and 0.1 behind on the rubric
The case for the Luan
Sivga Luan
- Looks and feels like a $500+ headphone for $360
- Real wood earcups with smooth blacked-out metal grills
- Spending $100 more buys a 0.1-point step up on the same chain
- Higher score, plainly - Recommended, 8.1/10, 0.1 clear of the Sivga Anser
Sound signature, overlaid
Both are plotted by the same model, reading each review's own wording, so the two are directly comparable rather than separately eyeballed.
| Axis | Sivga Anser | Sivga Luan |
|---|---|---|
| Warm to Bright | leans warm | leans warm |
| Relaxed to Analytical | sits near neutral | leans relaxed |
| Polite to Aggressive | leans aggressive | leans aggressive |
| Lean to Bass-heavy | leans lean | leans lean |
| Intimate to Wide stage | leans wide stage | sits near neutral |
Specs, side by side
The 3 specs both reviews record come first, so the rows you can actually compare are at the top. Manufacturer figures unless a measured value is noted; N/A means we haven't recorded that spec yet.
| Spec | Sivga Anser | Sivga Luan |
|---|---|---|
| Driver | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Impedance | 38 Ω | 38 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 105 dB | 100 dB |
| Frequency response | 20 Hz - 20 kHz | N/A |
| Weight | 342 g | N/A |
| Connector | N/A | Dual 3.5 mm |
| Magnets | N/A | 24.5 mm oversized |
Pros & cons, side by side
Anser
Pros
- Solid wood earcups with aluminum grilles and yokes
- No plastic - just wood, metal, and leather
- 342g - light enough for hours of listening
- Earcups rotate 180 degrees for fit adjustment
- Unique springy/bouncy mid-bass texture - addictive
Cons
- Soundstage is on the intimate side - not super wide
- Treble could be a bit more refined
- Sub-bass is present but not the main focus
- Hemp bag offers limited protection
- Upper mids may stand out on some tracks
- Soundstage feels centered vs. holographic options
Luan
Pros
- Looks and feels like a $500+ headphone for $360
- Real wood earcups with smooth blacked-out metal grills
- Suspension headband with Dekoni-style soft elements - zero hotspots
- Silent, perfectly damped cup swivel and tilt mechanism
- Large pads relative to cups - plenty of ear space
Cons
- Bass rolls off below ~45Hz
- Semi-open (felt behind grills) - not fully open-back
- Soundstage is decent but not hugely expansive
- Stock cable looks utilitarian - rubberized, single-ended only
- Sounds presented mostly in front, less around-the-head
- Mid-range scaling with better amplification is subtle
How they were tested head-to-head
Same chain for both - the Sivga Anser and the Sivga Luan, driven from the same HIFIMAN Serenade amp/DAC (Himalaya Pro R2R), fed bit-perfect from the Hermes 12th digital transport over USB. Output levels were matched first, because a half-decibel advantage reads as "better" to anyone. After that it was the same four kinds of material through both: acoustic, vocal-led, dense modern, and full orchestral. Everything below comes out of that, measured against the published headphones reference list at the matching price tier rather than against marketing copy.
What the 0.1-point score gap actually means
0.1 points is a real gap but a narrow one. It shows up on some tracks and disappears on others, and it never reverses: the Sivga Luan is ahead whenever it is audible at all. That is small enough that fit, comfort, or price can legitimately outweigh it.
What would flip the verdict
The Sivga Luan wins on the rubric, but the Sivga Anser becomes the right pick under three conditions. First, when system fit favours it - your amplifier, room, or source has a character that pairs better with this piece than with the higher scorer. Second, when one of the cons listed against the Sivga Luan is a hard disqualifier in your context: drive requirements, ergonomics, connectivity, or footprint. Third, when budget is genuinely binding - the Sivga Anser is the cheaper of the pair, and that saving can fund the next upgrade upstream. Outside those three, the higher score is the safer bet.
Common questions about this comparison
What's the real-world difference between the Sivga Anser and the Sivga Luan?
Scores first: the Sivga Luan takes it 8.1 to 8.0, a 0.1 gap. Their voicing is close - both sit in the same broad headphones character - so what separates them is the specifics each review calls out, not the overall tilt. Each review flags something different - the Anser's "Easy to drive (38Ω, 105dB sensitivity)" against the Luan's "Hard leather carrying case included". Those, not the decimal, are the real decision.
Which should you buy, the Sivga Anser or the Sivga Luan?
Default to the Sivga Luan - it's 0.1 ahead, about the narrowest gap that still shows up in a level-matched A/B - but on a sympathetic system the Sivga Anser, $100 cheaper, closes most of it. Take the Sivga Anser if its character or your chain leans that way; otherwise the Sivga Luan.
Is the Luan's $100 premium worth it?
Yes, on the numbers - the Sivga Luan costs $100 more and scores 0.1 higher, so you're buying a measurable step up, not a different flavour. Whether 0.1 points is worth $100 comes down to how central this piece is to your chain and how long it stays in it.
Where they rank
This page is the head-to-head - the buying guides put both of these up against the whole field.