Flare Audio E-PROTOTYPE Review: An IEM With Best-in-Class Bass, Love-or-Hate Mids
Unlike anything you've heard or seen. The E-PROTOTYPE goes to extremes - both positive and negative - using proprietary technologies you won't find anywhere else.
- Standout
- Possibly the best low-end of any IEM I've heard
- Watch out for
- Tonality is a love-or-hate situation
- Better alternative
- HIFIMAN RE2000 PRO Silver: $200 more, scores 0.8 higher.

Pick #4 of 7 in our Best IEMs guide.
These earphones are unlike anything else you've heard or seen. They go to extremes - both positive and negative ones. They use proprietary in-house developed technologies that you can't find anywhere else.
Flare Audio E-PROTOTYPE... let's take a closer look.
A 3D-printed build that needs a careful fit
They come with a thin, rubbery cable that doesn't feel very premium, but at least it doesn't tangle easily, like some aftermarket IEM cables I have tried. It ends with a single-ended 3.5mm slim plastic connector. There is no way to use them balanced - and for the worse, the cable is non-detachable. It's just a cable, and what's good about it is that it's lightweight and seems durable, plus on the website they said that they stress-tested it (somehow). Enough about it.
(view larger)
Let's move to the actual earpiece build quality, as it's interesting to say the least. They 3D-print it, and you may be like "What the hell, I don't want expensive, high-end IEMs to be 3D-printed!" - and that's fair. Flare Audio has a model that is both cheaper and fully made out of metal, if you care about it. But this is a prototype, a proof of concept made to show off what their technology is capable of and to support further research and development.
Moreover, as you can imagine, it's not printed with a standard cheap filament on a regular 3D printer. They use professional-grade equipment and materials to make them. The final result is a decently rigid-feeling capsule with a smooth texture and no roughness usually associated with 3D printing. As a bonus, they're very lightweight, unlike their full-metal brother. And, if it's important to you, they're not made in China - they produce them in their headquarters in the United Kingdom.
Their shape is the weirdest I have ever seen, and that's for a reason. They researched the internal shape of our ears and its effect on distortion. The effect of our ears on the frequency response is common knowledge at this point. But they wanted to go further, exploring the distortion produced by the human ear shape, and realized that our ears can distort the sound by as much as 20%. That's why they developed their "Mirror Image Sound™ Technology" - their shape is so weird to overcome the issues inside our ears. At least that's their explanation.
(view larger)
Is it even comfortable though? I didn't experience any major comfort-related issues while using them, but due to their shape being somewhat unusual, it may vary from person to person. As my ears are internally slightly asymmetrical, I faced one problem: I had to position the left earpiece in a very specific range of depth and angle. Otherwise, the sound would be greatly attenuated, which is something I have yet to encounter with other in-ear monitors. Nevertheless, once I got the fit right, I could use them for extended periods without any significant discomfort.
What you get in the box is a pack of replacement tips in different sizes and a hard carrying case. It has some stealth "FLARE" branding and feels very solid - I would trust it to protect my portable audio gear. It should fit some tiny dongle beside your earphones. If you need something bigger, Flare Audio offers a large hard carrying case that is rectangular, feels even better than the tiny model due to its softer internal finish, and is very affordable. It should fit around 2 to 3 pairs of IEMs with no issue, and if you're lucky, a dongle or two tiny ones are also very likely to make it inside at the same time. It's just perfect for traveling.
Deep, layered bass and recessed, peaky mids
They're tuned in a very, very specific way - almost in an odd way. You will either love it or hate it. I definitely would NOT recommend buying it as your only IEM with this kind of tuning. But as a complementary IEM, its tuning is unlike everything else I have ever heard.
As always, people's preferences vary, and to accommodate that, Flare Audio is offering a 100-day return window - which is just amazing to see. They're so sure of their products and they're not forcing customers to own them if they don't like them.
Let's start with the bass. The E-PROTOTYPEs have, in a way, THE best low-end of any IEM, or even headphones, I have ever heard. There's a lot of bass and it's keeping its integrity very well. The bass is extremely well layered, resolving, and so punchy, no matter the source I paired it with.
I think these earphones must have met the HIFIMAN HE-R9 at some point and took some inspiration from their duality and bipolarity, but they've taken it even further by pushing the extremes of both the positive and negative sides! Either way, the bass is definitely on the good side. If I were to pick one single thing that the Flare Audio E-PROTOTYPEs do well, way above their league, it would be the bass region. It hits hard, doesn't fall apart even despite its amount, and extends extraordinarily low, with some audible roll-off occurring in the 20-something Hz region.
The mids do not fit my preferences very well. They're tonally recessed yet peaky and unnatural. It makes the timbre take a huge hit in my opinion - although the instruments sound mostly engaging and fun.
Due to the treble region, I tend to find their tuning clockwise-tilted, with a slight V-shaped tendency. It often gets hidden by the bass - although it's not very boosted, when a song asks for it, it can pack an incredible amount of detail. They're kind of smooth-sounding, not necessarily due to their amount. Something else must be affecting them, because it's really unlike everything else I have ever heard.
Ideal separation and detail, weak timbre
Technical performance is where the E-PROTOTYPE flexes its muscles the most. I'd assume that its proprietary technology makes it like that.
Let's start with the sound separation - it's ideal. The instruments, vocals, background stuff - everything is exceptionally well separated and doesn't blend, pretty much no matter how busy or loud it gets.
Detail retrieval is at an astonishing level given the treble amount that we have. They are truly squeezing the most out of it, and I like it. These are some of the most resolving IEMs that don't get very sharp out of everything I've tried.
The soundstage is neither accurate nor wide in any direction, no matter what you do. It's pretty intimate, which is not a bad thing in itself - the vocals have the potential to sound as if someone is singing right next to your ear.
The dynamic range of this IEM is impeccable - it can hit and punch extremely hard. It tends to be rather a point of impact than a slam wall. It sounds very fast yet slow. Let me explain - the punch is there, but there's something that comes after the punch: a super long, detailed, and satisfying decay that is just impossible not to notice.
Timbre - if you have not noticed up to this point, it's not the biggest selling point of this product. Well... it's not a selling point at all. The E-PROTOTYPEs tend to make things sound off or slightly plasticky, likely because of the shell's material. It's not terrible, but if you're a timbre chaser, stay away from these.
E-PROTOTYPE sound signature
The review describes the Flare Audio E-PROTOTYPE as analytical and energetic, with an intimate stage.
Charted from the review's own words, quoted under each line.
Soundstage: Intimate
Also intimate, nearest in price: KBEAR KB02, Sivga Robin SV021 and Sivga Anser.
- “Soundstage is intimate, not wide” (from the cons)
- “It's pretty intimate, which is not a bad thing in itself…” (in Ideal separation and detail, weak timbre)
Presentation: Analytical
Also analytical, nearest in price: HIFIMAN RE2000 PRO Silver, HIFIMAN Svanar Wireless and HIFIMAN Sundara.
- “Bass is extremely well layered, resolving, and punchy” (from the pros)
- “The bass is extremely well layered, resolving, and so punchy, no matter the source I paired it with” (in Deep, layered bass and recessed, peaky mids)
Energy: Energetic
Also energetic, nearest in price: HIFIMAN RE800 Silver, KBEAR KB02 and Sivga Robin SV021.
- “Bass is extremely well layered, resolving, and punchy” (from the pros)
HIFIMAN RE800 Silver: Wide stage, energetic. Read the RE800 Silver review
HIFIMAN RE2000 PRO Silver: Analytical. Read the RE2000 PRO Silver review
HIFIMAN Svanar Wireless: Neutral, wide stage, analytical. Read the Svanar Wireless review
Simgot EM6L: Wide stage. Read the EM6L review
Hear what "intimate, analytical, energetic" means: a short synthesized loop, flat and then with those leanings. An illustration of the words, not a recording of the E-PROTOTYPE.
Not sure which signature suits you? Find yours with a blind A/B test
Watch the video review
Subscribe on YouTube (opens in new tab)Prefer to read? The written review above covers everything in the video.
- 0:00 A Flagship IEM That Looks Nothing Like One (opens in new tab)
- 0:18 Build Quality & Comfort (Stress Tested 3.5mm Cable) (opens in new tab)
- 0:53 Uniquely Shaped 3D Printed Shell (Fit, Isolation, Ergonomics) (opens in new tab)
- 1:52 Mirror Image Sound Technology - Less THD and BETTER Sound? (opens in new tab)
- 3:01 Accessories Included (Replacement Eartips, Hard IEM Carrying Case) (opens in new tab)
- 3:45 Sound Quality (Tuning, Tonality, Bass, Mids, Treble Balance) (opens in new tab)
- 6:04 Technical Performance (Sound Separation, Soundstage, Dynamics, Punch, Slam, Detail Retrieval, Speed, Timbre) (opens in new tab)
Common questions about the E-PROTOTYPE
Is the Flare Audio E-PROTOTYPE worth $149?
As a second IEM for bass, yes. At $149 it scored 8.0/10 with an excellent value rating, on the strength of possibly the best low end the reviewer has heard from any IEM, ideal separation and a lot of detail. Recessed, peaky mids and a slightly plasticky timbre will put some listeners off, and Flare offers a 100-day return window for anyone who ends up disliking the tuning.
Who is the E-PROTOTYPE for?
Listeners who already own a conventional IEM and want a second pair for deep, layered bass, clean separation and detail that doesn't turn sharp. Look elsewhere if you want true-to-life timbre, a wide soundstage, a detachable cable or a balanced connection, since it offers none of the four.
What alternatives to the Flare Audio E-PROTOTYPE at a similar price have been tested?
There is no comparison page for it. Reviewed here in the same price bracket: the Simgot EM6L at 7.6/10.
Why is the E-PROTOTYPE shaped so oddly?
Flare Audio says the shape comes from its Mirror Image Sound Technology. The company studied the inside of the human ear, concluded that the ear itself can distort sound by as much as 20%, and shaped the shell to counter that. The review presents this as Flare explaining its own design.
Is the E-PROTOTYPE hard to fit in your ears?
It can take some work. On the reviewer's slightly asymmetrical ears, the left earpiece only sounded right within a narrow range of depth and angle, and outside it the sound dropped away sharply, something no other in-ear had done. Once placed, it stayed comfortable for long sessions. With a shape this unusual, your ears may behave differently.
Can you replace the E-PROTOTYPE's cable?
No. The cable is fixed to the earpieces and ends in a slim, single-ended 3.5mm plastic plug, so there is no route to a balanced connection or an upgrade cable. It's thin and rubbery and doesn't feel premium, though it's light, seems durable and tangles less than some aftermarket IEM cables. Flare says it stress-tested the cable.
Is the E-PROTOTYPE's 3D-printed shell well made?
The print quality is high. Flare makes the shells at its UK headquarters on professional-grade equipment and materials, and they come out fairly rigid, smooth and very light. Buyers who would rather have metal can pick the cheaper all-metal model Flare also sells.
Where does the E-PROTOTYPE fall short?
In the midrange, and in timbre as a result. The mids are recessed yet peaky and unnatural, and instruments come out slightly plasticky, most likely because of the shell material. The soundstage is intimate too, which puts vocals close to your ear. For anyone who chases accurate timbre, the advice is to stay away.
Sources
- IEC 60268-7: Headphones and earphones
Standard International Electrotechnical Commission Paid full text
How the impedance, sensitivity and frequency response that headphone makers publish are defined. The figures quoted here are published ones; nothing is bench-measured in-house.
- IEC 60318-4: Occluded-ear simulator
Standard International Electrotechnical Commission Paid full text
The occluded-ear simulator: the coupler an in-ear monitor is measured on, standing in for the ear canal its tip seals.
- HyperPhysics: Sound quality or timbre
Reference Georgia State University
What timbre is physically: the harmonic content and envelope that make two instruments playing the same note sound different.
Discussed in Deep, layered bass and recessed, peaky mids
Alternatives to the E-PROTOTYPE
All 30 headphone reviewsSimilar type and price
HIFIMAN RE800 Silver has a bigger stage, $50 less, a near-tie on score 8.0
Kiwi Ears Orchestra Lite $100 more, a near-tie on score 8.0