Kiwi Ears Orchestra Lite Review: An 8-Driver IEM for $249

Pick #3 of 7 in our Best IEMs guide.

The Orchestra Lite from Kiwi Ears is an IEM that's meant to mimic the sound of a $500 flagship Orchestra model, but at a much lower price of $250. How did they make an in-ear monitor that's supposed to be almost as good as its 2x more expensive predecessor, and how does it perform?

Comfortable, even with a thick nozzle

Watch this part (0:22)

It's a fairly large IEM, looking at the shell itself. It has very smooth edges, and the outside part doesn't feel weird in any way. However, because of the crossover and the amount of drivers in there, the nozzle had to be extra thick. That's something you can definitely feel, and it makes the Orchestra Lite seem even larger than it actually is. Unless you find that to be a massive issue, it should be fairly comfortable, despite its size.

It's a gorgeous in-ear monitor. It has a semi-transparent enclosure, exposing the drivers and other internal components. As far as I'm aware, some part of the assembly is being handmade, by a human, as it's so tricky to do by a robot. There are a few faceplate colors to pick from - I've got the blue one, but you can also get it in green, purple, orange, or clear colorways.

(view larger)

The stock cable is of very nice quality - I wouldn't bother replacing it. It's a 4-core 7N oxygen-free copper construction, that's nicely braided and terminated with a decent metal 3.5mm connector.

(view larger)

In the box, you're also getting a small rectangular carrying case - ideal for transporting or storage. It can fit an extra dongle if you so desire.

Eight armature drivers split three ways

Watch this part (1:45)

The Orchestra Lite builds on the success of the original Orchestra model, offering the same 8 balanced armature driver configuration, with enhanced efficiency and cost-effectiveness. Those drivers are custom-made for Kiwi Ears to achieve superior performance while maintaining the same specifications as the older model.

They are divided using a 3-way crossover. Two custom ultra tweeters for precise treble, four midrange balanced armature drivers for clear mids, and two subwoofer drivers for deep, resonant lows. BA drivers are generally not very capable of playing full-range signals - that's why we rarely see single-balanced-armature IEMs. A simple solution is to use either multiple BAs or combine them with some other type of driver to get a nice full-range signal. These drivers can work in harmony to produce a balanced, natural sound that faithfully reproduces the original audio source.

So sensitive that cheap amps can hiss

Watch this part (2:50)

The impedance of this IEM is 16 ohms - it's quite low. The sensitivity, on the other hand, comes at 112dB - extremely high. This combination makes driving this in-ear monitor an ease for all sorts of devices. It's not sensitive to the source quality either, so you don't have to worry about it that much.

The only thing that can be a problem is the sensitivity being so high that some cheap, low-quality amps can pass through some hiss. This noise, despite usually not being a problem, is likely to be heard with such efficient IEMs.

Mid-forward and warm, with a deep soundstage

Watch this part (3:27)

Initially, the overall tuning seemed more or less neutral to my ears - but the more time I spent with it, the more I realized that it puts a fairly strong emphasis on the midrange. It means that the bass and treble are slightly tamed down, but not to the point of sounding flat or boring. It makes it neutral but with an audible sense of warmth.

I'd consider it a good thing, as the midrange itself is done in a very pleasant way - it sounds realistic, detailed, and is not messed up in any way.

The bass amount is good - it isn't bloated, sloppy, or boomy. But it has some roll-off as you get to the real sub-bass. Speaking of bass impact and dynamics, it's a relaxed IEM that seems like it's meant to make you chill out while listening to music, instead of hitting super hard.

The treble, on the other hand, is clarity-focused, offers lots of crunchiness to the top-end frequency sounds, and usually stays fairly clean. It accomplishes that without ever getting overly bright or sibilant.

The detail retrieval appears to vary from song to song, going from "just fine" to "very good". I think it has to do a lot with the mid-forward frequency response, and the way different albums are mixed.

The spatial effects are quite interesting here, pretty much the opposite of what every other product in this price range is trying to achieve. The soundstage width is somewhat limited - meaning the sound boundaries are not super far off. Usually, IEMs don't go super far, but this one is even more closed-in. However, the depth dimension here is definitely present, well-defined - and I'm surprised that it does it so well. You can easily tell when a sound source is brought forward or back, and it's a pleasant effect, as the sound is not just a wall in front of you.

The imaging is also outstanding for an IEM in this price range - it's sharp, focused, and precise, making instruments have a distinct place where they're placed.

So... should you buy it? I think it offers great value and good technical performance in most aspects. Personally, I like how it sounds, and even more, how it looks.